International Law Enforcement Academies (ILEA) Criminal Law Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the ILEA Criminal Law Exam with comprehensive resources including quizzes and explanations. Enhance your understanding of international law enforcement and improve your skills to excel in the exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


Under what condition does a statement during a custodial interrogation not need to be recorded?

  1. When the person does not agree to questioning

  2. When the equipment is faulty, but law enforcement believes it is working

  3. When the crime is a misdemeanor

  4. When the interrogation lasts longer than one hour

The correct answer is: When the equipment is faulty, but law enforcement believes it is working

A statement during a custodial interrogation does not need to be recorded when the equipment is faulty, but law enforcement believes it is working. The rationale behind this is that law enforcement agencies are typically required to record custodial interrogations to maintain a clear and accurate account of the interactions, ensuring transparency and protecting the rights of the individual being interrogated. However, if the recording equipment is genuinely malfunctioning and there is a belief that it is operational, this situation can permit the interrogation to continue without a recording. This acknowledges practical limitations while also highlighting the responsibility of law enforcement to ensure that such equipment is in proper working order to comply with the mandate of recording. The other options do not adequately clarify situations where recording is waived. In the case of a person not agreeing to questioning, that scenario would prevent interrogation from occurring at all. If the crime is a misdemeanor, recording protocols typically apply regardless of the severity of the offense, as safeguarding rights during any custodial scenario is paramount. Lastly, the duration of the interrogation exceeding one hour does not inherently inform the necessity of recording; rather, it is the nature of the interrogation and the related requirements for preservation of evidence and procedures that dictate whether a recording is necessary.